Cursor vs Windsurf
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool for your business
Our Verdict: Cursor is more mature; Windsurf is now part of Cognition, with pricing folded into Devin's plans
We've used both daily for months. Cursor's Composer and Agent mode are genuinely ahead, the multi-file editing feels like it understands your architecture, not just the file you're in. Windsurf's Cascade flow is impressive, and there's a free tier to trial. Note: Windsurf is now part of Cognition, and Windsurf-branded pricing no longer exists, windsurf.com/pricing redirects to Devin's plans (Free $0, Pro $20/mo, Max $200/mo, Teams $80/mo base plus $40/mo per full dev seat, Enterprise custom). If you're already in Cursor, there's no reason to switch.
Our Implementation Experience
Our engineering team evaluated both for 30 days. Cursor's codebase-aware AI completions are significantly better for large Next.js projects, it understands component relationships and API routes in context. Windsurf's strength is speed for smaller scripts and one-off files. We standardized on Cursor for PxlPeak development and client projects.
Based on real client deployments, not spec sheet comparisons.
At a Glance
Developers wanting the most capable AI-native coding experience
Free (Hobby) / $20/mo (Pro) / $60/mo (Pro+) / $200/mo (Ultra) / $40/user/mo (Teams)
intermediate
1-2 days
Developers wanting a capable AI IDE at a lower price point
Windsurf-branded pricing withdrawn, now via Devin's plans: Free / $20/mo (Pro) / $200/mo (Max) / $80/mo base + $40/mo per dev seat (Teams) / Custom (Enterprise)
intermediate
1-2 days
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-file editing | Composer (advanced) | Cascade flow |
| Agent mode | Yes (autonomous) | Yes (Cascade) |
| Model selection | Claude, GPT, Gemini | GPT, Claude (limited) |
| Codebase indexing | Full project | Full project |
| Inline autocomplete | Excellent | Excellent (Codeium engine) |
| Starting price | $20/mo (Pro) | $20/mo (Devin Pro: Windsurf pricing moved to Devin's plans) |
| Terminal integration | Yes | Yes |
Which to Choose by Use Case
Building a full feature from a spec
Agent mode handles multi-file implementation with better accuracy
Budget-conscious solo developer
Devin's Free plan gives a $0 entry point to trial before committing; the paid Pro plan matches Cursor at $20/mo
Large refactoring across dozens of files
Composer's multi-file editing is more mature and reliable
Team new to AI-assisted coding
Cleaner UX and a free tier reduce adoption friction
Need Help Deciding?
We implement both options. Tell us your use case and we'll recommend the right fit, then set it up for you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I migrate my VS Code setup to either of these?
Yes, both are VS Code forks. Extensions, themes, keybindings, and settings import directly. The switch takes minutes, not hours.
Is Windsurf good enough to replace Cursor?
For everyday coding with AI assist, yes. Where Cursor still pulls ahead is complex multi-file agent tasks and the breadth of model choices. If you mostly use inline completions and single-file chat, you won't notice much difference.
Which has better autocomplete?
Windsurf's autocomplete is powered by Codeium, which has years of refinement. Cursor's is excellent too. In practice, both feel snappy and accurate, autocomplete is not the differentiator between these two.
Do either of these work with JetBrains or Neovim?
No, both are standalone VS Code forks. If you need AI in JetBrains or Neovim, GitHub Copilot or Codeium's standalone extension are your options.
Related Comparisons
More head-to-head matchups for the tools in this comparison
Related Reading
Ready?
Put AI to Work for You.
Need help choosing? Our AI consultants will evaluate your specific needs and recommend the right tools, then implement them for you.
Aria picks up instantly · 24/7 · Free assessment · 30-day guarantee